24 HOUR ASSISTANCE — CONTACT (480) 745-2450

Simon Law

24 HOUR ASSISTANCE — CONTACT (480) 745-2450

  • About Simon
  • Family & Divorce
    • Divorce Do’s & Don’ts
    • Divorce Without Children in Arizona
    • Divorce With Children in Phoenix (child custody)
    • Legal Decision Making & Parenting Time
    • Termination of Parental Rights & Adoption
    • Grandparents’ Rights
    • Guardianship & Non-Parental Custody
    • Divorce Modification Without Children
    • Divorce Modification With Children
    • Business Valuation In Divorce
  • Personal Injury
    • Car Accidents
    • Trucking Accidents
    • Motorcycle Accidents
    • Dog Bites
    • Slip & Fall
    • Wrongful Death
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Contact Us

Blog

RECENT FAMILY LAW COURT RULINGS IN ARIZONA

Posted on 3rd August 2017 by RadiateWP in Divorce and Custody

Peak v. Peak, CA-CV2016-0131. HOME STATE OF CHILD Under the Uniformed Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) Arizona is the home state or the child was born in Arizona and had resided in Arizona with the parents for two months since the date of birth until Mother relocated with the child out of state.  Father had filed a Petition for Paternity within the six month period, since child had resided in Arizona.  Gutierrez v. Fox, CA SA 17-0047. CHILD SUPPORT When a court calculates child support under the child support guidelines, the court may not attribute income beyond that of regular full-time employment under A.R.S. §25-320 without a showing that the income is historically earned from a regular schedule and is anticipated to continue into the future.  This would apply to second jobs and overtime.  Also a parent who provides health insurance for the minor child and others, that amount must be pro-rated for child support purposes by looking to all persons covered by the portion of the premium.  Lundy v. Lundy, 1CA-CV15-0612. MISCELLANEOUS FAMILY LAW MATTERS A spouse who paid communicated expenses after filing a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage was entitled to reimbursement because the marital presumption of gift does not apply to payments made post-petition.   Also, a paragraph in a premarital agreement awarding fees to the prevailing party in any action based upon the agreement is unenforceable.  A.R.S. §2-324 will supersede the provision.  Bobrow v. Bobrow, 1CA-CV 14-0806.    ]]>

Next Post
Previous Post

Accredited
Member

American Association for Justice
Super Lawyers
American Association for Justice
Simon Law Group logo

LOCATION

Simon Law Group, LLC
2141 E Broadway Rd #113
Tempe, AZ 85282
P: (480) 745-2450
F: (480) 745-2454

SERVICES

  • Accident Injury Law
  • Personal Injury Law
  • Motorcycle Injury Law
  • Family Divorce Law
  • Liability Law
  • Brain Injury

resources

  • Personal Injury
  • Family Law
  • News
  • Client Testimonials
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer
  • Cookie Policy
Copyright © 2020 Simon Law Group.
All rights reserved. Website by Vuria
Copyright © 2020 Simon Law Group.
All rights reserved. Website by Vuria